Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Standard Motor Products, Inc.
How Standard Motor Products, Inc. stacks up
SMP · against 1,603 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Profitability
53/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #747 of 1,604 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score160 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including SMP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 2.5% vs peer median 3.3%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 61% of peers. Operating margin: 8.4% vs peer median 6.4%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 62% of peers. Return on invested capital: 9.9% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SMP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SMP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,510 reported | 9.9% | 7.3% | 62% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,601 reported | 8.4% | 6.4% | 61% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,528 reported | 2.5% | 3.3% | 41% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,476 reported | 12.5% | 7.7% | 68% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,613 reported | 32.0% | 30.2% | 53% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SMP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 747 | 1.1B USD | 53 | 52 | |
| 747 | 1.2B USD | 53 | 46 | |
| 747 | 2.6B EUR (≈$2.9B) | 53 | 49 | |
| 747 | 1.9B USD | 53 | 55 | |
| 747 | 1.0B USD | 53 | 60 | |
| 747 | 1.4B GBP (≈$1.8B) | 53 | 45 | |
| 747 | 2.1B AUD (≈$1.4B) | 53 | 49 | |
| 763 | 36.1B TWD (≈$1.1B) | 52 | 35 | |
| 763 | 1.8B CNY (≈$251M) | 52 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score