Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SM · against 80 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #66 of 81 · scores higher than 19% of peers · safety percentile 20
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)14 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including SM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 81 reported | 0.95× | 0.62× | 29% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 82 reported | 0.75 | 0.56 | 30% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 79 reported | 0.61× | 1.25× | 6% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.4B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 2 | 5.2B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 3 | 15.9B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 4 | 7.5B AUD (≈$5.0B) | 94 | 51 | |
| 5 | 42.6B CNY (≈$6.0B) | 83 | 63 | |
| 62 | 4.6B USD | 23 | 17 | |
| 63 | 6.6B USD | 22 | 28 | |
| 64 | 6.1B EUR (≈$6.7B) | 21 | 43 | |
| 65 | 13.0B USD | 20 | 50 | |
| 66 | 8.7B USD | 20 | 67 | |
| 67 | 750.1B INR (≈$9.0B) | 19 | 33 | |
| 68 | 6.7B USD | 19 | 53 | |
| 69 | 4.7B USD | 19 | 40 | |
| 70 | 5.1B USD | 18 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score