Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to SM Energy Company
How SM Energy Company stacks up
SM · against 187 other Energy companies listed in US-listed
Growth
94/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #15 of 188 · scores higher than 91% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score28 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including SM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 94?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 78% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -40.5% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 95% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 27.8% vs peer median -1.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 97% of peers. Revenue growth: 75.4% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 192 reported | 75.4% | 7.9% | 95% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 141 reported | -40.5% | 2.9% | 21% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 186 reported | 27.8% | 1.0% | 94% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 2 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 49 | |
| 5 | 4.1B USD | 98 | 60 | |
| 14 | 7.5B USD | 95 | 68 | |
| 15 | 900M USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 15 | 120.0B USD | 94 | 62 | |
| 15 | 109.0B USD | 94 | 58 | |
| 15 | 8.7B USD | 94 | 67 | |
| 19 | 412M USD | 93 | 42 | |
| 20 | 942M USD | 92 | 69 | |
| 20 | 111.6B USD | 92 | 70 | |
| 22 | 5.1B USD | 91 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score