Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Silgan Holdings Inc.
How Silgan Holdings Inc. stacks up
SLGN · against 1,603 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Profitability
54/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #731 of 1,604 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score160 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including SLGN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 2.8% vs peer median 3.3%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 7.9% vs peer median 7.3%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 69% of peers. Operating margin: 10.2% vs peer median 6.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SLGN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SLGN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,510 reported | 7.9% | 7.3% | 53% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,601 reported | 10.2% | 6.4% | 69% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,528 reported | 2.8% | 3.3% | 44% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,476 reported | 11.7% | 7.7% | 66% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,613 reported | 17.1% | 30.2% | 24% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SLGN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 731 | 4.4B USD | 54 | 53 | |
| 731 | 13.9B USD | 54 | 44 | |
| 731 | 2.6B USD | 54 | 49 | |
| 731 | 2.5B USD | 54 | 43 | |
| 731 | 4.4B USD | 54 | 45 | |
| 747 | 48.0B TWD (≈$1.5B) | 53 | 48 | |
| 747 | 250.0B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 53 | 64 | |
| 747 | 3.5B CNY (≈$484M) | 53 | 44 | |
| 747 | 826.9B JPY (≈$5.6B) | 53 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score