Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SLDP · against 576 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #104 of 577 · scores higher than 82% of peers · safety percentile 86
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)69 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including SLDP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SLDP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 555 reported | 0.02× | 0.39× | 94% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 568 reported | 1.95 | 0.48 | 3% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 565 reported | 14.61× | 1.56× | 99% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 49.3B JPY (≈$336M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 2 | 16.5B TWD (≈$513M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 3 | 38.1B JPY (≈$259M) | 99 | 88 | |
| 4 | 92.4B JPY (≈$628M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 5 | 2.5B CNY (≈$357M) | 99 | 71 | |
| 100 | 6.2B CNY (≈$867M) | 87 | 64 | |
| 101 | 2.2B CNY (≈$312M) | 87 | 45 | |
| 102 | 6.3B CNY (≈$880M) | 86 | 40 | |
| 103 | 3.9B CNY (≈$539M) | 86 | 82 | |
| 104 | 463M USD | 86 | 26 | |
| 105 | 563M USD | 86 | 47 | |
| 106 | 322M USD | 86 | 23 | |
| 107 | 4.1B CNY (≈$579M) | 86 | 24 | |
| 108 | 71.4B INR (≈$857M) | 86 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score