Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
HYLN · against 1,584 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #218 of 1,585 · scores higher than 86% of peers · safety percentile 86
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)158 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including HYLN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | HYLN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported | 0.02× | 0.50× | 95% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported | 3.57 | 0.56 | 0% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported | 7.59× | 1.48× | 98% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 2 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 100 | 74 | |
| 5 | 61M MYR (≈$13M) | 100 | 29 | |
| 214 | 545M HKD (≈$70M) | 87 | 63 | |
| 215 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 6.3B CNY (≈$880M) |
| 86 |
| 40 |
| 216 | 3.9B CNY (≈$539M) | 86 | 82 |
| 217 | 463M USD | 86 | 26 |
| 218 | 563M USD | 86 | 47 |
| 219 | 13.9B CNY (≈$1.9B) | 86 | 82 |
| 220 | 322M USD | 86 | 23 |
| 221 | 4.1B CNY (≈$579M) | 86 | 24 |
| 222 | 101.6B TWD (≈$3.2B) | 86 | 60 |