Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Champion Homes, Inc.
How Champion Homes, Inc. stacks up
SKY · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #231 of 356 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score38 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including SKY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 62% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -8.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.4% vs peer median 4.3%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.5% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SKY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SKY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 4.5% | 5.9% | 43% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | -8.3% | 6.2% | 35% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 4.4% | 4.1% | 53% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SKY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 227 | 3.7B USD | 46 | 66 | |
| 227 | 5.1B USD | 46 | 46 | |
| 227 | 36.3B USD | 46 | 49 | |
| 231 | 5.4B USD | 45 | 46 | |
| 231 | 4.7B USD | 45 | 61 | |
| 233 | 2.1B USD | 44 | 30 | |
| 233 | 119.7B USD | 44 | 48 | |
| 233 | 11.8B USD | 44 | 73 | |
| 233 | 10.2B USD | 44 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score