Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Tanger Inc.
How Tanger Inc. stacks up
SKT · against 141 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
42/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #88 of 142 · scores higher than 36% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score23 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including SKT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 65% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.9% vs peer median 5.3%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.7% vs peer median 6.5%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.4% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SKT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SKT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 145 reported | 2.9% | 5.0% | 28% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 141 reported | 5.4% | 5.4% | 50% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 68 reported | 6.7% | 6.1% | 55% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 147 reported | 15.6% | 94.7% | 3% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SKT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.9B USD | 96 | 67 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 93 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.10T JPY (≈$7.5B) | 90 | 82 | |
| 4 | 2.9B USD | 89 | 68 | |
| 5 | 880.1B JPY (≈$6.0B) | 84 | 64 | |
| 84 | 7.5B USD | 44 | 61 | |
| 87 | 3.4B USD | 43 | 69 | |
| 88 | 5.0B GBP (≈$6.5B) | 42 | 40 | |
| 88 | 5.6B USD | 42 | 56 | |
| 88 | 4.5B USD | 42 | 49 | |
| 88 | 2.2B EUR (≈$2.4B) | 42 | 32 | |
| 92 | 6.1B SGD (≈$4.7B) | 41 | 44 | |
| 93 | 547.3B JPY (≈$3.7B) | 40 | 52 | |
| 93 | 4.8B EUR (≈$5.3B) | 40 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score