Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.
How First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. stacks up
FR · against 662 other Real Estate companies
Valuation
44/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #369 of 663 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score66 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including FR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 44?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.0% vs peer median 6.5%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.0% vs peer median 5.3%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.3% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 708 reported | 5.0% | 5.3% | 47% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 681 reported | 5.3% | 5.3% | 48% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 307 reported | 6.0% | 6.8% | 45% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 724 reported | 38.1% | 112.8% | 11% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 227M MYR (≈$50M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 394M HKD (≈$50M) | 99 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 362 | 14.8B USD | 45 | 51 | |
| 369 | 10.0B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 44 | 40 | |
| 369 | 3.2B EUR (≈$3.5B) | 44 | 38 | |
| 369 | 2.7B USD | 44 | 39 | |
| 369 | 7.5B USD | 44 | 61 | |
| 369 | 1.4B CHF (≈$1.7B) | 44 | 57 | |
| 369 | 15.2B USD | 44 | 66 | |
| 369 | 19.6B USD | 44 | 48 | |
| 376 | 87.3B USD | 43 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score