Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Grupo Simec, S.A.B. de C.V.
How Grupo Simec, S.A.B. de C.V. stacks up
SIM · against 182 other Basic Materials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
5/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #179 of 183 · scores higher than 2% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score7 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including SIM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 5?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 98% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -86.8% vs peer median 9.4%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 93% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -17.6% vs peer median -0.0%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 84% of peers. Revenue growth: -10.0% vs peer median 3.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SIM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SIM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 187 reported | -10.0% | 9.9% | 7% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 102 reported | -86.8% | 17.1% | 2% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 180 reported | -17.6% | 1.5% | 4% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SIM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.8B USD | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 8.9B USD | 100 | 85 | |
| 3 | 41.2B USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 3 | 6.0B USD | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 15.9B USD | 99 | 75 | |
| 175 | 15.0B USD | 13 | 24 | |
| 177 | 1.9B USD | 9 | 33 | |
| 178 | 5.2B USD | 6 | 19 | |
| 179 | 226M USD | 5 | 68 | |
| 179 | 4.0B USD | 5 | 54 | |
| 181 | 947M USD | 4 | 21 | |
| 181 | 34M USD | 4 | 4 | |
| 183 | 721M USD | 2 | 19 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score