Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ferroglobe PLC
How Ferroglobe PLC stacks up
GSM · against 1,274 other Basic Materials companies
Growth
2/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #1,244 of 1,275 · scores higher than 2% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score122 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including GSM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 2?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 95% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -19.9% vs peer median -0.0%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 94% of peers. Revenue growth: -18.8% vs peer median 3.4%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GSM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GSM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,289 reported | -18.8% | 3.4% | 6% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 826 reported | Not reported | 9.4% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,263 reported | -19.9% | -0.0% | 5% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GSMScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score