Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SILC · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #414 of 1,698 · scores higher than 76% of peers · safety percentile 76
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including SILC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SILC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.06× | 0.26× | 75% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 1.57 | 0.84 | 14% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 3.06× | 1.83× | 76% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 410 | 28.2B TWD (≈$873M) | 76 | 59 | |
| 411 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 6.4B CNY (≈$894M) |
| 76 |
| 65 |
| 412 | 971M CAD (≈$709M) | 76 | 70 |
| 413 | 41.9B JPY (≈$285M) | 76 | 76 |
| 414 | 183M USD | 76 | 29 |
| 415 | 3.9B EUR (≈$4.2B) | 76 | 55 |
| 416 | 9.8B USD | 76 | 58 |
| 417 | 136M EUR (≈$149M) | 75 | 73 |
| 418 | 2.6B HKD (≈$329M) | 75 | 30 |