Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SIFY · against 157 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Ranked #145 of 158 · scores higher than 8% of peers · safety percentile 10
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)20 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including SIFY · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SIFY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 147 reported | 2.56× | 0.31× | 8% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 155 reported | 1.32 | 0.64 | 9% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 153 reported | Not reported | 1.47× | — | — | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 82.4B JPY (≈$560M) | 100 | 76 | |
| 2 | 17.62T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 98 | 58 | |
| 4 | 1.07T KRW (≈$770M) | 96 | 85 | |
| 5 | 1.90T KRW (≈$1.4B) | 96 | 73 | |
| 141 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 12 | 40 | |
| 142 | 6.2B CNY (≈$870M) | 11 | 30 | |
| 143 | 655M EUR (≈$720M) | 11 | 20 | |
| 144 | 630M USD | 11 | 27 | |
| 145 | 926M USD | 10 | 39 | |
| 146 | 4.1B CNY (≈$567M) | 10 | 5 | |
| 147 | 8.1B HKD (≈$1.0B) | 9 | 51 | |
| 148 | 972M USD | 8 | 35 | |
| 149 | 1.7B USD | 8 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score