Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SHOO · against 1,584 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #742 of 1,585 · scores higher than 53% of peers · safety percentile 53
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)159 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including SHOO · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SHOO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported | 0.39× | 0.50× | 58% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported | 1.16 | 0.56 | 17% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported | 1.91× | 1.48× | 67% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 2 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 100 | 74 | |
| 5 | 61M MYR (≈$13M) | 100 | 29 | |
| 738 | 1.4B USD | 53 | 62 | |
| 739 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 4.6B USD |
| 53 |
| 74 |
| 740 | 6.4B CNY (≈$899M) | 53 | 62 |
| 741 | 1.8B CNY (≈$251M) | 53 | 50 |
| 742 | 3.2B USD | 53 | 65 |
| 743 | 35.3B CNY (≈$4.9B) | 53 | 57 |
| 744 | 300.2B JPY (≈$2.0B) | 53 | 59 |
| 745 | 6.5B CNY (≈$908M) | 53 | 67 |
| 746 | 7.1B CNY (≈$999M) | 53 | 65 |