Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
How Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. stacks up
SHO · against 662 other Real Estate companies
Valuation
52/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #316 of 663 · scores higher than 52% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score66 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including SHO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 52?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.A mix: stronger EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Real Estate peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 71% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.7% vs peer median 5.3%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 62% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 8.3% vs peer median 6.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 69% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.5% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SHO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SHO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 708 reported | 1.7% | 5.3% | 29% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 681 reported | 6.5% | 5.3% | 69% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 307 reported | 8.3% | 6.8% | 62% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 724 reported | 68.5% | 112.8% | 25% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SHO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 227M MYR (≈$50M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 394M HKD (≈$50M) | 99 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 316 | 3.6B MYR (≈$788M) | 52 | 66 | |
| 316 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score