Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SHAK · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #276 of 356 · scores higher than 22% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score36 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including SHAK · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its free cash flow yield, earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | SHAK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 1.4% | 4.3% | 26% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 4.9% | 8.4% | 24% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | -0.4% | 5.3% | 16% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 19.2% | 35.8% | 34% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 2 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 4 | 395M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 4 | 114.1B USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 274 | 1.2B USD | 25 | 19 | |
| 274 | 24.9B USD | 25 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 49 |
| 276 | 5.0B USD | 24 | 43 |
| 276 | 3.5B USD | 24 | 41 |
| 276 | 3.0B USD | 24 | 46 |
| 276 | 4.4B USD | 24 | 49 |
| 280 | 100.0B USD | 23 | 58 |
| 280 | 14.5B USD | 23 | 29 |
| 280 | 2.1B USD | 23 | 40 |