Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Andersen Group Inc.
How Andersen Group Inc. stacks up
ANDG · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
25/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #1,158 of 1,553 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including ANDG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 25?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -4.3% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 62% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.5% vs peer median 4.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 79% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 13.8% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ANDG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ANDG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 5.7% | 4.4% | 62% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 6.8% | 8.8% | 38% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 13.8% | 6.1% | 79% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | -87.6% | 57.2% | 1% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ANDGScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score