Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Super Group (SGHC) Limited
How Super Group (SGHC) Limited stacks up
SGHC · against 266 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #99 of 267 · scores higher than 63% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score36 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including SGHC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 63% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.1% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 68% of peers. Earnings yield: 6.4% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SGHC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SGHC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 266 reported | 6.4% | 5.3% | 64% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 270 reported | 11.1% | 9.5% | 61% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 131 reported | Not reported | 6.3% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 269 reported | 14.6% | 42.9% | 20% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SGHC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 3 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 4 | 25.5B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 83 | |
| 4 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 95 | 5.9B USD | 65 | 49 | |
| 95 | 2.5B GBP (≈$3.3B) | 65 | 68 | |
| 95 | 8.0B USD | 65 | 48 | |
| 99 | 4.4B USD | 64 | 49 | |
| 99 | 5.7B USD | 64 | 77 | |
| 101 | 6.2B CAD (≈$4.5B) | 63 | 34 | |
| 102 | 10.5B USD | 62 | 57 | |
| 102 | 3.3B USD | 62 | 33 | |
| 102 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 62 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score