Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SFBS · against 908 other Banks & Insurance companies
Ranked #233 of 909 · scores higher than 74% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score90 peers with a profitability score of 70–79, including SFBS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its return on equity and return on assets, which are stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | SFBS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 784 reported | 10.0% | 10.4% | 48% | Context only | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 136 reported | Not reported | 14.5% | — | — | Context only |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 913 reported | 1.7% | 1.2% | 72% | 50% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 904 reported | 17.3% | 11.2% | 82% | 50% | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 951 reported | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0% | Context only |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 192.8B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 98 | 47 | |
| 1 | 98.7B JPY (≈$671M) | 98 | 43 | |
| 1 | 66.1B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 1 | 79.2B BRL (≈$14.3B) | 98 | 61 | |
| 1 | 275.9B INR (≈$3.3B) | 98 | 38 | |
| 233 | 510.9B ZAR (≈$28.1B) | 74 | 39 | |
| 233 | 2.2B USD | 74 | 63 | |
| 233 | 6.9B NOK (≈$654M) | 74 | 59 | |
| 233 | 6.1B EUR (≈$6.8B) | 74 | ||
| 233 | 4.5B USD | 74 | 56 | |
| 233 | 504M SGD (≈$383M) | 74 | 57 | |
| 242 | 2.3B HKD (≈$299M) | 73 | ||
| 242 | 659.5B INR (≈$7.9B) | 73 | 49 | |
| 242 | 5.3B USD | 73 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score