Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to SEI Investments Company
How SEI Investments Company stacks up
SEIC · against 268 other Financial Services companies
Valuation
41/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #158 of 269 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score27 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including SEIC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.0% vs peer median 6.9%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.4% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.6% vs peer median 5.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SEIC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SEIC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 410 reported | 5.4% | 5.6% | 49% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 206 reported | 6.0% | 6.8% | 43% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 183 reported | 5.2% | 6.1% | 46% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 401 reported | 19.8% | 83.1% | 15% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SEIC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 82M USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 3 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 156 | 31.6B USD | 42 | 57 | |
| 156 | 1.7B USD | 42 | 49 | |
| 158 | 530M EUR (≈$583M) | 41 | 43 | |
| 158 | 674M USD | 41 | 53 | |
| 158 | 12.7B USD | 41 | 63 | |
| 161 | 6.5B MYR (≈$1.4B) | 40 | 57 | |
| 161 | 3.9B AUD (≈$2.6B) | 40 | 43 | |
| 161 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 40 | 48 | |
| 164 | 16.4B USD | 39 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score