Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to SEI Investments Company
How SEI Investments Company stacks up
SEIC · against 43 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Valuation
41/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #25 of 44 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score7 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including SEIC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.0% vs peer median 6.9%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.4% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.6% vs peer median 5.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SEIC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SEIC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 55 reported | 5.4% | 4.8% | 54% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 41 reported | 6.0% | 7.7% | 30% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 27 reported | 5.2% | 6.5% | 27% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 56 reported | 19.8% | 38.1% | 25% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SEIC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 226.5B SEK (≈$22.7B) | 98 | 87 | |
| 2 | 6.5B USD | 94 | 48 | |
| 3 | 5.3B GBP (≈$6.9B) | 92 | 79 | |
| 4 | 9.2B GBP (≈$11.9B) | 86 | 58 | |
| 5 | 15.3B EUR (≈$16.8B) | 82 | 57 | |
| 21 | 8.4B USD | 45 | 63 | |
| 22 | 15.1B USD | 44 | 38 | |
| 23 | 13.1B AUD (≈$8.6B) | 43 | 55 | |
| 23 | 11.8B USD | 43 | 51 | |
| 25 | 12.7B USD | 41 | 63 | |
| 26 | 16.4B USD | 39 | 54 | |
| 27 | 11.7B USD | 38 | 33 | |
| 28 | 14.1B USD | 37 | 57 | |
| 29 | 6.7B CHF (≈$7.7B) | 33 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score