Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to SEI Investments Company
How SEI Investments Company stacks up
SEIC · against 53 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Growth
46/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #33 of 54 · scores higher than 38% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score9 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including SEIC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 46?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 5.6% vs peer median 10.0%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 9.1% vs peer median 10.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 11.1% vs peer median 7.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SEIC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SEIC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 56 reported | 11.1% | 11.3% | 49% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 47 reported | 5.6% | 18.1% | 30% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 50 reported | 9.1% | 8.9% | 51% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SEIC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16.5B GBP (≈$21.4B) | 99 | 41 | |
| 2 | 226.5B SEK (≈$22.7B) | 98 | 87 | |
| 3 | 888.3B INR (≈$10.7B) | 97 | 59 | |
| 4 | 24.3B USD | 95 | 67 | |
| 5 | 18.9B USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 30 | 6.7B CHF (≈$7.7B) | 52 | 54 | |
| 31 | 24.1B USD | 51 | 54 | |
| 32 | 19.0B CAD (≈$13.9B) | 47 | 60 | |
| 33 | 11.7B USD | 46 | 33 | |
| 33 | 12.7B USD | 46 | 63 | |
| 35 | 9.2B GBP (≈$11.9B) | 45 | 58 | |
| 36 | 749.2B INR (≈$9.0B) | 42 | ||
| 36 | 24.5B USD | 42 | 47 | |
| 36 | 22.7B USD | 42 | 64 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score