Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to SEI Investments Company
How SEI Investments Company stacks up
SEIC · against 131 other Financial Services companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
41/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #75 of 132 · scores higher than 43% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score14 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including SEIC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.0% vs peer median 6.9%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.4% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.6% vs peer median 5.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SEIC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SEIC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 191 reported | 5.4% | 4.8% | 53% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 80 reported | 6.0% | 6.9% | 39% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 133 reported | 5.2% | 5.6% | 48% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 187 reported | 19.8% | 63.8% | 22% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SEIC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 82M USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 3 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 72 | 11.8B USD | 43 | 51 | |
| 73 | 31.6B USD | 42 | 57 | |
| 73 | 1.7B USD | 42 | 49 | |
| 75 | 674M USD | 41 | 53 | |
| 75 | 12.7B USD | 41 | 63 | |
| 77 | 16.4B USD | 39 | 54 | |
| 77 | 3.0B USD | 39 | 52 | |
| 79 | 96.0B USD | 38 | 48 | |
| 79 | 11.7B USD | 38 | 33 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score