Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SE · against 62 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #29 of 63 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score8 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including SE · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker EBITDA yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | SE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 61 reported | 3.4% | 4.4% | 32% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 64 reported | 5.9% | 6.6% | 43% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 37 reported | 10.0% | 3.9% | 83% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 61 reported | 26.4% | 14.8% | 62% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 219.5B CNY (≈$30.7B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 2 | 37.54T KRW (≈$27.0B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 3 | 4.04T JPY (≈$27.5B) | 93 | 76 | |
| 4 | 200.3B HKD (≈$25.6B) | 88 | 55 | |
| 5 | 659.6B HKD (≈$84.4B) | 86 | 72 | |
| 26 | 57.2B USD | 44 | 50 | |
| 26 | 73.8B EUR (≈$81.2B) | 44 | 58 | |
| 28 | 24.8B USD | 43 | 54 | |
| 29 | 34.0B USD | 40 | 52 | |
| 29 | 47.0B USD | 40 | 61 | |
| 31 | 3.98T JPY (≈$27.1B) | 39 | 74 | |
| 31 | 51.5B USD | 39 | 50 | |
| 33 | 27.1B USD | 38 | 58 | |
| 34 | 84.3B USD | 37 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score