Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Smith Douglas Homes Corp.
How Smith Douglas Homes Corp. stacks up
SDHC · against 179 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Growth
33/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #140 of 180 · scores higher than 21% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score21 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including SDHC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 33?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 90% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -52.2% vs peer median 11.2%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 65% of peers. Revenue growth: -1.2% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 68% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 8.7% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SDHC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SDHC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 182 reported | -1.2% | 5.9% | 18% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 133 reported | -52.2% | 13.9% | 11% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 174 reported | 8.7% | 4.8% | 66% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SDHC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 3 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 4 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 4 | 34.7B USD | 98 | 45 | |
| 137 | 563M USD | 34 | 45 | |
| 137 | Unavailable | 34 | 31 | |
| 140 | 3.2B USD | 33 | 44 | |
| 140 | 14.0B USD | 33 | 40 | |
| 140 | 86M USD | 33 | 78 | |
| 140 | 523M USD | 33 | 28 | |
| 144 | 6.7B USD | 32 | 28 | |
| 145 | 1.2B USD | 31 | 29 | |
| 145 | 804M USD | 31 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score