Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SCZM · against 1,354 other Basic Materials companies
Ranked #1,147 of 1,355 · scores higher than 15% of peers · safety percentile 15
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)135 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including SCZM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, which is weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SCZM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,322 reported | 0.21× | 0.36× | 63% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,325 reported | 2.88 | 0.66 | 0% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,285 reported | 1.51× | 1.77× | 40% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26.3B INR (≈$316M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 226M USD | 100 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.4B CNY (≈$902M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 3 | 7.6B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 3 | 17.3B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1,143 | 15.0B USD | 16 | 24 | |
| 1,144 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 32.6B CNY (≈$4.6B) |
| 16 |
| 51 |
| 1,145 | 85.4B USD | 16 | 46 |
| 1,146 | 106.8B CNY (≈$15.0B) | 15 | 56 |
| 1,147 | 630M USD | 15 | 61 |
| 1,148 | 1.6B DKK (≈$233M) | 15 | 23 |
| 1,149 | 97.93T IDR (≈$6.1B) | 15 | 47 |
| 1,150 | 10.4B USD | 15 | 58 |
| 1,151 | 81.3B CNY (≈$11.4B) | 15 | 52 |