Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Scholastic Corporation
How Scholastic Corporation stacks up
SCHL · against 142 other Communication Services companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
54/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #63 of 143 · scores higher than 55% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score13 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including SCHL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Communication Services norm.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 82% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 0.4% vs peer median 7.4%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.9% vs peer median 8.6%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 8.4% vs peer median 2.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SCHL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SCHL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 140 reported | 3.7% | 3.0% | 53% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 144 reported | 7.5% | 9.3% | 44% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 131 reported | 0.4% | 7.5% | 19% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 144 reported | 105.2% | 45.9% | 76% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SCHL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 4.5B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 743M USD | 97 | 67 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 97 | 81 | |
| 5 | 393M USD | 96 | 78 | |
| 61 | 474M USD | 58 | 68 | |
| 62 | 726M USD | 56 | 31 | |
| 63 | 4.5B USD | 54 | 46 | |
| 63 | 5.5B USD | 54 | 37 | |
| 63 | 701M USD | 54 | 51 | |
| 66 | 11.7B USD | 53 | 41 | |
| 66 | 840M USD | 53 | 24 | |
| 68 | 73.9B USD | 52 | 58 | |
| 69 | 388M USD | 51 | 29 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score