Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SBS · against 359 other Utilities companies
Ranked #132 of 360 · scores higher than 64% of peers · safety percentile 64
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)36 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including SBS · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Utilities norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SBS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 354 reported | 1.14× | 1.21× | 52% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 347 reported | 0.07 | 0.40 | 89% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 347 reported | 1.47× | 1.05× | 75% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.9B CNY (≈$260M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1 | 1.6B BRL (≈$297M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 1 | 1.6B BRL (≈$286M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1 | 369M USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2.7B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 128 | 3.12T INR (≈$37.4B) | 65 | 62 | |
| 129 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 55.8B USD |
| 64 |
| 34 |
| 130 | 11.9B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 64 | 63 |
| 131 | 13.8B EUR (≈$15.2B) | 64 | 64 |
| 132 | 15.5B USD | 64 | 72 |
| 133 | 502M USD | 63 | 42 |
| 134 | 962.3B JPY (≈$6.5B) | 63 | 50 |
| 135 | 4.1B USD | 63 | 43 |
| 136 | 575.4B CLP (≈$633M) | 62 | 46 |