Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to StandardAero, Inc.
How StandardAero, Inc. stacks up
SARO · against 365 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
48/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #209 of 366 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score64 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including SARO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.6% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.9% vs peer median 3.8%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.5% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SARO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SARO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 3.8% | 4.2% | 44% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 367 reported | 7.3% | 7.4% | 48% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 183 reported | 2.6% | 4.0% | 31% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 349 reported | 33.6% | 34.6% | 47% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SARO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 2 | 9.3B SGD (≈$7.1B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 3 | 6.28T KRW (≈$4.5B) | 98 | 53 | |
| 3 | 37.8B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 86 | |
| 3 | 49.8B HKD (≈$6.4B) | 98 | 74 | |
| 209 | 7.2B USD | 48 | 70 | |
| 209 | 12.8B CAD (≈$9.4B) | 48 | 47 | |
| 209 | 14.2B USD | 48 | 64 | |
| 209 | 11.9B USD | 48 | 51 | |
| 209 | 8.3B USD | 48 | 62 | |
| 216 | 31.8B CNY (≈$4.4B) | 47 | 68 | |
| 216 | 4.7B USD | 47 | 40 | |
| 216 | 5.5B USD | 47 | 29 | |
| 216 | 4.5B USD | 47 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score