Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Saratoga Investment Corp.
How Saratoga Investment Corp. stacks up
SAR · against 61 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Growth
32/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #29 of 62 · scores higher than 52% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score7 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including SAR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 32?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 11.1% vs peer median 10.0%
- Earnings per share turned from a profit to a loss. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 10.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 70% of peers. Revenue growth: 18.6% vs peer median 7.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SAR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SAR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 68 reported | 18.6% | -3.3% | 75% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 39 reported | 14.4% | -6.7% | 66% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 53 reported | 11.1% | 4.8% | 71% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SAR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 2 | 956M HKD (≈$122M) | 98 | 71 | |
| 3 | 282M USD | 97 | ||
| 4 | 249M USD | 96 | 31 | |
| 5 | 370M USD | 92 | 85 | |
| 25 | 353M USD | 39 | 59 | |
| 27 | 31.7B INR (≈$381M) | 38 | 28 | |
| 28 | 500M NZD (≈$300M) | 34 | 52 | |
| 29 | 342M EUR (≈$376M) | 32 | 77 | |
| 29 | 219M USD | 32 | 20 | |
| 31 | 433M USD | 30 | 46 | |
| 32 | 1.3B MYR (≈$289M) | 29 | 49 | |
| 32 | 426M AUD (≈$281M) | 29 | ||
| 34 | 2.5B HKD (≈$323M) | 28 | 27 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score