Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Saratoga Investment Corp.
How Saratoga Investment Corp. stacks up
SAR · against 153 other Financial Services companies listed in US-listed
Growth
32/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #118 of 154 · scores higher than 24% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score12 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including SAR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 32?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 11.1% vs peer median 10.0%
- Earnings per share turned from a profit to a loss. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 10.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 70% of peers. Revenue growth: 18.6% vs peer median 7.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SAR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SAR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 179 reported | 18.6% | 10.5% | 65% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 131 reported | 14.4% | 11.4% | 57% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 138 reported | 11.1% | 11.5% | 50% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SAR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 3 | 601M USD | 98 | 72 | |
| 3 | 843M USD | 98 | ||
| 5 | 282M USD | 97 | ||
| 114 | 14.1B USD | 36 | 57 | |
| 115 | 13.7B USD | 35 | 42 | |
| 115 | 38.4B USD | 35 | 22 | |
| 117 | 3.8B USD | 34 | 58 | |
| 118 | 219M USD | 32 | 20 | |
| 119 | 852M USD | 31 | ||
| 119 | 4.4B USD | 31 | 32 | |
| 121 | 433M USD | 30 | 46 | |
| 122 | 551M USD | 27 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score