Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to SAP SE
How SAP SE stacks up
SAP · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Valuation
54/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #760 of 1,667 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score167 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including SAP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.1% vs peer median 4.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.3% vs peer median 2.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 62% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.8% vs peer median 2.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SAP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SAP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | 3.3% | 2.3% | 62% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 5.1% | 4.3% | 55% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | 3.7% | 2.7% | 57% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | Not reported | 33.4% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SAP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 760 | 7.5B TWD (≈$234M) | 54 | 32 | |
| 760 | 1.9B USD | 54 | 41 | |
| 760 | 862M USD | 54 | 58 | |
| 760 | 3.8B USD | 54 | 74 | |
| 760 | 265.8B USD | 54 | 68 | |
| 776 | 150.4B CNY (≈$21.1B) | 53 | 65 | |
| 776 | 20.2B TWD (≈$625M) | 53 | 43 | |
| 776 | 3.7B CNY (≈$522M) | 53 | 57 | |
| 776 | 1.7B CNY (≈$244M) | 53 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score