Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SANG · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,137 of 1,698 · scores higher than 33% of peers · safety percentile 33
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)169 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including SANG · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SANG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.20× | 0.26× | 55% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 1.12 | 0.84 | 32% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 0.78× | 1.83× | 5% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 1,133 | 750M USD | 33 | 34 | |
| 1,134 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 8.1B USD |
| 33 |
| 55 |
| 1,135 | 3.6B CNY (≈$499M) | 33 | 45 |
| 1,136 | 335M GBP (≈$436M) | 33 | 22 |
| 1,137 | 151M USD | 33 | 33 |
| 1,138 | 10.6B USD | 33 | 60 |
| 1,139 | 181M THB (≈$5M) | 33 | 14 |
| 1,140 | 42.7B CNY (≈$6.0B) | 33 | 49 |
| 1,141 | 2.6B CNY (≈$361M) | 33 | 37 |