Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SANG · against 168 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #120 of 169 · scores higher than 29% of peers · safety percentile 33
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)13 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including SANG · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SANG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 155 reported | 0.20× | 0.23× | 52% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 159 reported | 1.12 | 0.74 | 23% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 170 reported | 0.78× | 1.98× | 7% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 2 | 129M USD | 100 | 48 | |
| 3 | 160.7B KRW (≈$116M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 4 | 147M USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 5 | 16.2B JPY (≈$110M) | 98 | 75 | |
| 116 | 1.7B CNY (≈$244M) | 35 | 45 | |
| 117 | 1.4B CNY (≈$194M) | 35 | 12 | |
| 118 | 378M AUD (≈$250M) | 34 | 53 | |
| 119 | 29.8B JPY (≈$203M) | 34 | 66 | |
| 120 | 151M USD | 33 | 33 | |
| 121 | 255M USD | 33 | 54 | |
| 122 | 2.1B SEK (≈$212M) | 33 | 15 | |
| 123 | 9.4B TWD (≈$292M) | 32 | 24 | |
| 124 | 4.6B TWD (≈$143M) | 31 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score