Ranked #767 of 918 · scores higher than 16% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score
91 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including SAFT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 16?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its earnings yield and book yield, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 86% of peers. Earnings yield: 4.5% vs peer median 7.9%
▼a higher price relative to book value (P/B): weaker than 74% of peers. Book yield: 57.3% vs peer median 79.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SAFT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
SAFT
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Earnings yieldHigher is better · 928 reported
4.5%
8.1%
14%
60%
EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 228 reported
6.3%
10.3%
32%
Context only
Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 507 reported
11.5%
8.1%
71%
Context only
Book yieldHigher is better · 914 reported
57.3%
78.2%
26%
40%
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
