Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RZLT · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #155 of 1,373 · scores higher than 89% of peers · safety percentile 89
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including RZLT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | RZLT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.01× | 0.24× | 90% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 0.61 | 0.53 | 44% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 9.68× | 2.62× | 87% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 151 | 2.21T KRW (≈$1.6B) | 89 | 57 | |
| 152 | 424M USD |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 89 |
| 45 |
| 153 | 500M USD | 89 | 63 |
| 154 | 7.8B USD | 89 | 30 |
| 155 | 388M USD | 89 | 36 |
| 156 | 1.0B USD | 89 | 74 |
| 157 | 12.6B USD | 89 |
| 158 | 334M USD | 89 | 36 |
| 159 | 650M USD | 88 | 48 |