Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Revolve Group, Inc.
How Revolve Group, Inc. stacks up
RVLV · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
38/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #218 of 356 · scores higher than 37% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score49 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including RVLV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 38?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 75% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 1.8% vs peer median 6.1%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.0% vs peer median 8.8%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.7% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RVLV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RVLV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 4.7% | 4.3% | 55% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 7.0% | 8.4% | 40% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | 1.8% | 5.3% | 22% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 35.2% | 35.8% | 49% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RVLV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 2 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 4 | 395M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 4 | 114.1B USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 218 | 365M USD | 38 | 20 | |
| 218 | 332.9B USD | 38 | 45 | |
| 218 | 5.5B USD | 38 | 36 | |
| 218 | 378M USD | 38 | 26 | |
| 218 | 1.5B USD | 38 | 63 | |
| 218 | 27.1B USD | 38 | 58 | |
| 225 | 2.1B USD | 37 | 30 | |
| 225 | 13.0B USD | 37 | 68 | |
| 225 | 1.2B USD | 37 | 33 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score