Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Rush Enterprises, Inc.
How Rush Enterprises, Inc. stacks up
RUSHA · against 285 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
61/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #158 of 286 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score41 peers with a profitability score of 60–69, including RUSHA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 61?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 5.1% vs peer median 6.4%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 71% of peers. Return on invested capital: 12.5% vs peer median 7.3%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 74% of peers. Return on assets: 5.7% vs peer median 3.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RUSHA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RUSHA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 273 reported | 12.5% | 10.3% | 61% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 286 reported | 5.1% | 9.2% | 25% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 269 reported | 5.7% | 4.7% | 62% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 256 reported | 11.8% | 12.4% | 45% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 288 reported | 19.9% | 30.6% | 28% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RUSHA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 106.7B TWD (≈$3.3B) | 99 | 71 | |
| 3 | 4.6B USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 158 | 23.8B CNY (≈$3.3B) | 61 | 58 | |
| 158 | 598.9B JPY (≈$4.1B) | 61 | 67 | |
| 158 | 6.2B USD | 61 | 60 | |
| 158 | 3.1B USD | 61 | 59 | |
| 158 | 5.2B USD | 61 | 50 | |
| 163 | 21.0B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 60 | 67 | |
| 163 | 3.3B EUR (≈$3.6B) | 60 | 48 | |
| 163 | 4.5B GBP (≈$5.8B) | 60 | 56 | |
| 163 | 7.2B EUR (≈$7.9B) | 60 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score