Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Rush Enterprises, Inc.
How Rush Enterprises, Inc. stacks up
RUSHA · against 361 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
61/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #174 of 362 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score32 peers with a profitability score of 60–69, including RUSHA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 61?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 5.1% vs peer median 6.4%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 71% of peers. Return on invested capital: 12.5% vs peer median 7.3%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 74% of peers. Return on assets: 5.7% vs peer median 3.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RUSHA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RUSHA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 349 reported | 12.5% | 9.5% | 61% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 362 reported | 5.1% | 7.1% | 42% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 358 reported | 5.7% | 4.1% | 62% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 315 reported | 11.8% | 11.8% | 50% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 363 reported | 19.9% | 36.0% | 23% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RUSHA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 1 | 2.4B USD | 99 | 65 | |
| 1 | 11.5B USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 1 | 10.7B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 1 | 6.5B USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 174 | 17.7B USD | 61 | 54 | |
| 174 | 16.7B USD | 61 | 54 | |
| 174 | 6.2B USD | 61 | 60 | |
| 174 | 3.1B USD | 61 | 59 | |
| 174 | 5.2B USD | 61 | 50 | |
| 179 | 511M USD | 60 | 50 | |
| 179 | 1.1B USD | 60 | 55 | |
| 181 | 13.5B USD | 59 | 62 | |
| 181 | 1.6B USD | 59 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score