Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Repay Holdings Corporation
How Repay Holdings Corporation stacks up
RPAY · against 1,668 other Technology companies
Growth
37/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,044 of 1,669 · scores higher than 37% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score166 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including RPAY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 37?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Technology peers.
- The loss per share widened. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 8.8% vs peer median 8.5%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.2% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RPAY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RPAY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,689 reported | 8.8% | 8.5% | 51% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,071 reported | Not reported | 11.1% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,659 reported | 5.2% | 4.8% | 52% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RPAY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 1,044 | 2.7B AUD (≈$1.8B) | 37 | 49 | |
| 1,044 | 751M USD | 37 | 46 | |
| 1,044 | 445M USD | 37 | 17 | |
| 1,044 | 2.4B USD | 37 | 56 | |
| 1,044 | 399M USD | 37 | 23 | |
| 1,044 | 18.4B USD | 37 | 56 | |
| 1,061 | 80.2B CNY (≈$11.2B) | 36 | 45 | |
| 1,061 | 8.1B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 36 | 14 | |
| 1,061 | 4.20T KRW (≈$3.0B) | 36 | 29 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score