Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Construction Partners, Inc.
How Construction Partners, Inc. stacks up
ROAD · against 445 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
42/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #312 of 446 · scores higher than 29% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score62 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including ROAD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 62% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.6% vs peer median 3.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.2% vs peer median 3.7%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.6% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ROAD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ROAD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 438 reported | 2.6% | 4.3% | 24% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 450 reported | 6.9% | 7.9% | 40% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 198 reported | 3.2% | 4.1% | 39% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 438 reported | 19.1% | 40.3% | 18% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ROAD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 4 | 22.0B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 4 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 308 | 5.1B USD | 43 | 52 | |
| 312 | 92.2B TWD (≈$2.9B) | 42 | 52 | |
| 312 | 6.7B USD | 42 | 53 | |
| 312 | 4.3B USD | 42 | 35 | |
| 312 | 5.5B USD | 42 | 52 | |
| 312 | 9.4B USD | 42 | 48 | |
| 312 | 3.2B USD | 42 | 64 | |
| 318 | 23.4B MYR (≈$5.1B) | 41 | 46 | |
| 318 | 52.9B CNY (≈$7.4B) | 41 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score