Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RNG · against 298 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #292 of 299 · scores higher than 2% of peers · safety percentile 4
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)30 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including RNG · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | RNG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 288 reported | Not reported | 0.30× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 282 reported | 1.15 | 1.01 | 38% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 297 reported | 1.11× | 1.80× | 15% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 2 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 3 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 4 | 3.5B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 5 | 625.8B JPY (≈$4.3B) | 99 | 78 | |
| 288 | 3.5B USD | 5 | 35 | |
| 289 | 12.9B USD | 5 | 53 | |
| 290 | 5.2B USD | 4 | 47 | |
| 291 | 3.4B USD | 4 | 24 | |
| 292 | 6.5B USD | 4 | 48 | |
| 293 | 10.0B USD | 4 | 59 | |
| 294 | 3.3B USD | 3 | 52 | |
| 295 | 8.9B USD | 1 | 4 | |
| 296 | 25.8B CNY (≈$3.6B) | 1 | 27 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score