Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CIFR · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,626 of 1,698 · scores higher than 4% of peers · safety percentile 4
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including CIFR · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CIFR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 9.51× | 0.26× | 1% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 3.21 | 0.84 | 1% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 3.00× | 1.83× | 75% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 1,622 | 56M USD | 4 | 6 | |
| 1,623 | 14.4B USD | 4 | 59 | |
| 1,624 | 6.2B CNY (≈$870M) | 4 | 30 | |
| 1,625 | 5.2B USD | 4 | 47 | |
| 1,626 | 3.4B USD | 4 | 24 | |
| 1,627 | 6.5B USD | 4 | 48 | |
| 1,628 | 4.0B TWD (≈$126M) | 4 | 32 | |
| 1,629 | 10.0B USD | 4 | 59 | |
| 1,630 | 1.6B USD | 4 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score