Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ResMed Inc.
How ResMed Inc. stacks up
RMD · against 454 other Healthcare companies listed in US-listed
Growth
54/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #274 of 455 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score45 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including RMD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 10.3% vs peer median 9.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 9.9% vs peer median 6.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 63% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 10.2% vs peer median 5.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RMD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RMD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 475 reported | 9.9% | 11.0% | 48% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 171 reported | 10.3% | 21.2% | 39% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 433 reported | 10.2% | 11.0% | 48% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RMD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 464M USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 1.4B USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 2 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 2 | 8.8B USD | 99 | 31 | |
| 2 | 90M USD | 99 | 27 | |
| 271 | 139M USD | 55 | 32 | |
| 271 | 108.6B USD | 55 | 66 | |
| 274 | 8.9B USD | 54 | 51 | |
| 274 | 100.2B USD | 54 | 57 | |
| 274 | 32.8B USD | 54 | 69 | |
| 274 | 28.6B USD | 54 | 60 | |
| 278 | 2.5B USD | 53 | 60 | |
| 278 | 21.5B USD | 53 | 60 | |
| 278 | 1.2B USD | 53 | 24 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score