Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to RE/MAX Holdings Inc
How RE/MAX Holdings Inc stacks up
RMAX · against 268 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Profitability
70/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #77 of 269 · scores higher than 70% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score29 peers with a profitability score of 70–79, including RMAX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 70?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 63% of peers. Operating margin: 15.6% vs peer median 26.8%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 74% of peers. Return on invested capital: 5.3% vs peer median 3.4%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 90% of peers. Return on assets: 5.0% vs peer median 2.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RMAX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RMAX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 262 reported | 5.3% | 3.3% | 76% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 258 reported | 15.6% | 25.2% | 38% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 263 reported | 5.0% | 2.0% | 89% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 260 reported | Not reported | 4.8% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 270 reported | 75.5% | 53.7% | 78% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RMAX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.42T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 83 | |
| 2 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 91 | |
| 2 | 678M AUD (≈$447M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 4 | 59.8B JPY (≈$406M) | 98 | 80 | |
| 4 | 3.3B HKD (≈$418M) | 98 | 75 | |
| 77 | 610M EUR (≈$671M) | 70 | 67 | |
| 77 | 1.3B SGD (≈$961M) | 70 | 62 | |
| 77 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 70 | 65 | |
| 77 | 7.2B SEK (≈$720M) | 70 | 56 | |
| 77 | 681M USD | 70 | 52 | |
| 82 | 913M NZD (≈$548M) | 69 | 57 | |
| 82 | 338M EUR (≈$371M) | 69 | 53 | |
| 82 | 42.1B INR (≈$506M) | 69 | 71 | |
| 85 | 6.9B SEK (≈$685M) | 68 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score