Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RLJ-PA · against 662 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #455 of 663 · scores higher than 31% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score66 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including RLJ-PA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Real Estate peers.
| Metric | RLJ-PA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 708 reported | -6.6% | 5.3% | 13% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 681 reported | 5.4% | 5.3% | 53% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 307 reported | Not reported | 6.8% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 724 reported | 48.4% | 112.8% | 16% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 227M MYR (≈$50M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 394M HKD (≈$50M) | 99 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 455 | 34.5B USD | 31 | 51 | |
| 455 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 2.1B CAD (≈$1.6B) |
| 31 |
| 44 |
| 455 | 1.1B USD | 31 | 32 |
| 455 | 62.3B USD | 31 | 49 |
| 455 | Unavailable | 31 | 33 |
| 455 | 83.6B SEK (≈$8.4B) | 31 | 47 |
| 462 | 148.3B HKD (≈$19.0B) | 30 | 51 |
| 462 | 314.6B JPY (≈$2.1B) | 30 | 44 |
| 462 | 4.8B CAD (≈$3.5B) | 30 | 35 |