Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Raymond James Financial, Inc.
How Raymond James Financial, Inc. stacks up
RJF · against 366 other Financial Services companies
Growth
52/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #175 of 367 · scores higher than 52% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score36 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including RJF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 52?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 12.1% vs peer median 10.0%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 10.2% vs peer median 10.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 10.5% vs peer median 7.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RJF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RJF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 395 reported | 10.5% | 7.4% | 57% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 299 reported | 12.1% | 9.9% | 52% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 329 reported | 10.2% | 10.0% | 52% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RJF| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 1 | 1.5B CHF (≈$1.7B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | 16.5B GBP (≈$21.4B) | 99 | 41 | |
| 1 | 761M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 172 | 8.9B USD | 53 | 50 | |
| 172 | 1.3B AUD (≈$862M) | 53 | 36 | |
| 175 | 323.2B INR (≈$3.9B) | 52 | 58 | |
| 175 | 49.8B USD | 52 | 55 | |
| 175 | 31.1B USD | 52 | 65 | |
| 175 | 6.7B CHF (≈$7.7B) | 52 | 54 | |
| 179 | 67.1B USD | 51 | 51 | |
| 179 | 4.2B USD | 51 | 55 | |
| 179 | 113M USD | 51 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score