Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Raymond James Financial, Inc.
How Raymond James Financial, Inc. stacks up
RJF · against 33 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Growth
52/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #23 of 34 · scores higher than 30% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score5 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including RJF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 52?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 12.1% vs peer median 10.0%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 10.2% vs peer median 10.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 10.5% vs peer median 7.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RJF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RJF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 35 reported | 10.5% | 12.3% | 41% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 31 reported | 12.1% | 22.6% | 27% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 32 reported | 10.2% | 10.4% | 48% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RJF| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16.5B GBP (≈$21.4B) | 99 | 41 | |
| 2 | 226.5B SEK (≈$22.7B) | 98 | 87 | |
| 3 | 24.3B USD | 95 | 67 | |
| 4 | 18.9B USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 5 | 1.49T INR (≈$17.9B) | 93 | 71 | |
| 18 | 16.2B USD | 60 | 37 | |
| 21 | 21.7B SGD (≈$16.5B) | 55 | 61 | |
| 21 | 46.6B USD | 55 | 40 | |
| 23 | 49.8B USD | 52 | 55 | |
| 23 | 31.1B USD | 52 | 65 | |
| 25 | 24.1B USD | 51 | 54 | |
| 26 | 391.0B SEK (≈$39.1B) | 48 | 57 | |
| 27 | 56.1B EUR (≈$61.7B) | 44 | 53 | |
| 28 | 24.5B USD | 42 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score