Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Raymond James Financial, Inc.
How Raymond James Financial, Inc. stacks up
RJF · against 131 other Financial Services companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
53/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #55 of 132 · scores higher than 58% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score14 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including RJF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.6% vs peer median 6.1%
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 7.4% vs peer median 5.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RJF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RJF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 191 reported | 7.1% | 4.8% | 60% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 80 reported | Not reported | 6.9% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 133 reported | 4.6% | 5.6% | 43% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 187 reported | 40.9% | 63.8% | 39% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RJF| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 82M USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 3 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 52 | 13.7B USD | 57 | 42 | |
| 53 | 5.9B USD | 56 | 69 | |
| 54 | 23.7B USD | 54 | 59 | |
| 55 | 1.5B USD | 53 | 74 | |
| 55 | 31.1B USD | 53 | 65 | |
| 57 | 9.6B USD | 52 | 73 | |
| 57 | 994M USD | 52 | 51 | |
| 59 | 46.6B USD | 51 | 40 | |
| 59 | 772M USD | 51 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score