Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RIVN · against 1,584 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #1,197 of 1,585 · scores higher than 24% of peers · safety percentile 24
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)159 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including RIVN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | RIVN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported | 1.04× | 0.50× | 28% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported | 1.62 | 0.56 | 6% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported | 2.10× | 1.48× | 72% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 2 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 100 | 74 | |
| 5 | 61M MYR (≈$13M) | 100 | 29 | |
| 1,193 | 732.9B KRW (≈$528M) | 25 | 61 | |
| 1,194 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 34.6B EUR (≈$38.1B) |
| 25 |
| 42 |
| 1,195 | 8.9B SEK (≈$889M) | 25 | 38 |
| 1,196 | 322.1B JPY (≈$2.2B) | 25 | 54 |
| 1,197 | 19.2B USD | 24 | 29 |
| 1,198 | 17.2B GBP (≈$22.4B) | 24 | 60 |
| 1,199 | 100.4B KRW (≈$72M) | 24 | 42 |
| 1,200 | 826.9B JPY (≈$5.6B) | 24 | 50 |
| 1,201 | 413M HKD (≈$53M) | 24 | 25 |